<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unclapping music</title>
	<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/</link>
	<description>desearch and revelopment</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gasten</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-31644</link>
		<pubDate><br />
<b>Warning</b>:  mktime() expects parameter 4 to be long, string given in <b>/home/.lynn/jgollonet/jesusgollonet.com/blog/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>24</b><br />
Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-31644</guid>
					<description>I really like the tight time controllign system in chuck. That was the biggest obsticle in PD for me.

But they are all (pd, max/msp, chuck supercollider, etc (csound)) just different tools for the (more or less) same result. Give it a shot. If you don't like it, you don't need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the tight time controllign system in chuck. That was the biggest obsticle in PD for me.</p>
<p>But they are all (pd, max/msp, chuck supercollider, etc (csound)) just different tools for the (more or less) same result. Give it a shot. If you don&#8217;t like it, you don&#8217;t need to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hola, mundo. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On ChucK, Terry Riley, Jim Bumgardner and emulating old masters through code</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-5222</link>
		<pubDate><br />
<b>Warning</b>:  mktime() expects parameter 4 to be long, string given in <b>/home/.lynn/jgollonet/jesusgollonet.com/blog/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>24</b><br />
Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-5222</guid>
					<description>[...] So this morning I found that someone had already done an idea which I had been thinking of for some time (probably since I did the Steve Reich&#8217;s Clapping Music version in ChucK): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So this morning I found that someone had already done an idea which I had been thinking of for some time (probably since I did the Steve Reich&#8217;s Clapping Music version in ChucK): [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: 020200</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4566</link>
		<pubDate><br />
<b>Warning</b>:  mktime() expects parameter 4 to be long, string given in <b>/home/.lynn/jgollonet/jesusgollonet.com/blog/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>24</b><br />
Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4566</guid>
					<description>Yes, I see this. A had lots of discussion on visual programming vs. textual with collegues upon that. I think I really am a patching guy, just love the flow and quick results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I see this. A had lots of discussion on visual programming vs. textual with collegues upon that. I think I really am a patching guy, just love the flow and quick results&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jesús gollonet</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4565</link>
		<pubDate><br />
<b>Warning</b>:  mktime() expects parameter 4 to be long, string given in <b>/home/.lynn/jgollonet/jesusgollonet.com/blog/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>24</b><br />
Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4565</guid>
					<description>well, you shouldn't. 

I think it is a matter of tastes and of which programming paradigm you're more comfortable with. 

I, for example, have been wanting to learn max/msp for long before there was a windows version. When they released it, I was really really happy, but having tried it many times since then, I've come to realize that I'm much more comfortable with textual programming than with the patch-based one, so for now I'll go for chuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, you shouldn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>I think it is a matter of tastes and of which programming paradigm you&#8217;re more comfortable with. </p>
<p>I, for example, have been wanting to learn max/msp for long before there was a windows version. When they released it, I was really really happy, but having tried it many times since then, I&#8217;ve come to realize that I&#8217;m much more comfortable with textual programming than with the patch-based one, so for now I&#8217;ll go for chuck.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: 020200</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4562</link>
		<pubDate><br />
<b>Warning</b>:  mktime() expects parameter 4 to be long, string given in <b>/home/.lynn/jgollonet/jesusgollonet.com/blog/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>24</b><br />
Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4562</guid>
					<description>Interesting thing, but why should I use Chuck when I can have maxMSP or PureData? Just curious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thing, but why should I use Chuck when I can have maxMSP or PureData? Just curious&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
