<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unclapping music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unclapping-music</link>
	<description>desearch and revelopment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:07:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gasten</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-31644</link>
		<dc:creator>Gasten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/?p=133#comment-31644</guid>
		<description>I really like the tight time controllign system in chuck. That was the biggest obsticle in PD for me.

But they are all (pd, max/msp, chuck supercollider, etc (csound)) just different tools for the (more or less) same result. Give it a shot. If you don&#039;t like it, you don&#039;t need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the tight time controllign system in chuck. That was the biggest obsticle in PD for me.</p>
<p>But they are all (pd, max/msp, chuck supercollider, etc (csound)) just different tools for the (more or less) same result. Give it a shot. If you don&#8217;t like it, you don&#8217;t need to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hola, mundo. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On ChucK, Terry Riley, Jim Bumgardner and emulating old masters through code</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-5222</link>
		<dc:creator>Hola, mundo. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On ChucK, Terry Riley, Jim Bumgardner and emulating old masters through code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/?p=133#comment-5222</guid>
		<description>[...] So this morning I found that someone had already done an idea which I had been thinking of for some time (probably since I did the Steve Reich&#8217;s Clapping Music version in ChucK): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So this morning I found that someone had already done an idea which I had been thinking of for some time (probably since I did the Steve Reich&#8217;s Clapping Music version in ChucK): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 020200</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>020200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/?p=133#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>Yes, I see this. A had lots of discussion on visual programming vs. textual with collegues upon that. I think I really am a patching guy, just love the flow and quick results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I see this. A had lots of discussion on visual programming vs. textual with collegues upon that. I think I really am a patching guy, just love the flow and quick results&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesús gollonet</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4565</link>
		<dc:creator>jesús gollonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/?p=133#comment-4565</guid>
		<description>well, you shouldn&#039;t. 

I think it is a matter of tastes and of which programming paradigm you&#039;re more comfortable with. 

I, for example, have been wanting to learn max/msp for long before there was a windows version. When they released it, I was really really happy, but having tried it many times since then, I&#039;ve come to realize that I&#039;m much more comfortable with textual programming than with the patch-based one, so for now I&#039;ll go for chuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, you shouldn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>I think it is a matter of tastes and of which programming paradigm you&#8217;re more comfortable with. </p>
<p>I, for example, have been wanting to learn max/msp for long before there was a windows version. When they released it, I was really really happy, but having tried it many times since then, I&#8217;ve come to realize that I&#8217;m much more comfortable with textual programming than with the patch-based one, so for now I&#8217;ll go for chuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 020200</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2006/07/25/unclapping-music/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>020200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/?p=133#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>Interesting thing, but why should I use Chuck when I can have maxMSP or PureData? Just curious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thing, but why should I use Chuck when I can have maxMSP or PureData? Just curious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

