Comments on: Meanwhile, near by… http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=meanwhile desearch and revelopment Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:07:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: lopz http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-112705 lopz Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:42:00 +0000 http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-112705 Hola bueno, encontré un amigo me recomendó OF y pues me he metido a aprenderlo, y en el foro he visto un link a tu blog y pasé a leerte un poco, osea que me tendrás por aquí más seguido. Saludos desde Santa Cruz de la Sierra - Bolivia Hola

bueno, encontré un amigo me recomendó OF y pues me he metido a aprenderlo, y en el foro he visto un link a tu blog y pasé a leerte un poco, osea que me tendrás por aquí más seguido.

Saludos desde Santa Cruz de la Sierra – Bolivia

]]> By: inma http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-87039 inma Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:49:00 +0000 http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-87039 ...y tu mientras tanto ¿qué haces? …y tu mientras tanto ¿qué haces?

]]> By: Graham http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77562 Graham Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:01:00 +0000 http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77562 I just found out about the second seminar! I'll certainly try to be there, there is always more I can do to work on my ChucKing technique... Thanks for mentioning it. G I just found out about the second seminar! I’ll certainly try to be there, there is always more I can do to work on my ChucKing technique… Thanks for mentioning it.

G

]]> By: jesus gollonet http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77555 jesus gollonet Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:34:00 +0000 http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77555 And yes, come check out to hangar. I can't be there next week but will be there the week after (and try to attend as often as I can). Btw, there is also a chuck workshop with eduard aylon coming soon in hangar. I've signed up for that too, as I've recently started again to =>. Will you be there? Best! And yes, come check out to hangar. I can’t be there next week but will be there the week after (and try to attend as often as I can).

Btw, there is also a chuck workshop with eduard aylon coming soon in hangar. I’ve signed up for that too, as I’ve recently started again to =>. Will you be there?

Best!

]]> By: jesus gollonet http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77554 jesus gollonet Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:29:00 +0000 http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77554 hey graham! that's a really interesting question... They share a lot of things, including a similar api (which makes for a good transition) and target audience, much of the things that you can do in one you can do in the other with similar ease... But really, as soon as I've started thinking I've seen pragmatic implications (that, in my opinion, do make a difference) at several different levels: - the underlying platform (java vs c++) - the status of the development (near 1.0 vs just launched) - the approach (integrated IDE vs light glue api) -... In fact I'd like to take some time to ellaborate (maybe on a different post, as I think it's an interesting topic to discuss). I use both often and think other people do too, so I can comment on the reasons that make me open one or the other for a particular task. Anyway, to give a superfast, dumb answer I'd say: If you're going to need web output, go for processing; if you're going to deal with video, go for openframeworks. will be back with more :) hey graham!

that’s a really interesting question… They share a lot of things, including a similar api (which makes for a good transition) and target audience, much of the things that you can do in one you can do in the other with similar ease…

But really, as soon as I’ve started thinking I’ve seen pragmatic implications (that, in my opinion, do make a difference) at several different levels:

- the underlying platform (java vs c++)
- the status of the development (near 1.0 vs just launched)
- the approach (integrated IDE vs light glue api)
-…

In fact I’d like to take some time to ellaborate (maybe on a different post, as I think it’s an interesting topic to discuss). I use both often and think other people do too, so I can comment on the reasons that make me open one or the other for a particular task.

Anyway, to give a superfast, dumb answer I’d say: If you’re going to need web output, go for processing; if you’re going to deal with video, go for openframeworks.

will be back with more :)

]]> By: Graham http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77544 Graham Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:04:00 +0000 http://www.jesusgollonet.com/blog/2008/10/11/meanwhile/#comment-77544 Jesus, How would you contrast processing and openFrameworks in terms of pragmatics? Are there aspects that make a big difference? Hangar is such a cool place. Thanks for posting this. I'd love to check it out soon, perhaps the week after next. Graham Jesus,

How would you contrast processing and openFrameworks in terms of pragmatics? Are there aspects that make a big difference?

Hangar is such a cool place. Thanks for posting this. I’d love to check it out soon, perhaps the week after next.

Graham

]]>